FCC 700 MHz Auction Postscript: Big loss for US Wireless Network Competition

We have previously opined that the highly touted 700 MHz auction was a win for the U.S. government (almost $20B was raised) and Google (open access rules for C block w/o spending a dime).  Yet it was a big loss for public safety. 
Based on a post auction spectrum analysis from a well placed source, we conclude that wireless competition is all but non-existent in the U.S.  This is due to the huge swath of spectrum acquired by AT&T and Verizon Wireless and their previous acquisitions (especially AT&T’s acquisition of Aloho Partners, Dobson Communications, and RCC).  As a result, AT&T and Verizon Wireless now have a choke hold on spectrum to be used for cellular telephony and broadband services (via LTE).  This has numerous negative repercussions and questions whether the FCC will follow their rule on the 95 MHz Dobson threshold (explained below).
References:  previous posts on this topic are at:
The FCC’s recent decision consenting to the merger of AT&T Inc. ("AT&T") and Dobson Communications Corporation ("Dobson") represents a shift in the how the FCC reviews mergers of wireless carriers, which will affect how carriers view and enter into transactions in the future.  Most significantly, the FCC adopted a higher spectrum threshold to screen transactions for potential competitive harm. 
Although the FCC no longer applies a cap to wireless carriers’ spectrum holdings, it does apply a screening test* to determine whether the combined spectrum holdings of merging companies could raise competitive concerns.  The FCC increased its previous spectrum screen of 70 MHz to 95 MHz or more as a result of the Dobson order in late 2007. 
The new 95 MHz threshold represents approximately one-third of the 280 MHz spectrum that would be suitable for mobile telephony.  
*Explanation of the FCC 95 MHz screening test/ safe harbor (as a result of Dobson order):


The FCC has from time to time implemented a spectrum screen as a threshold to scrutinize wireless carrier mergers.  If a merger amongst wireless carriers causes the acquirer to have more than 95 MHz in a market, the FCC will scrutinize the transaction and possibly force a divestiture of some licenses. It is not clear whether the same standard applies to spectrum auctions, though there is no principled reason why it should matter whether you get your spectrum in a merger or an auction.
AT&T and Verizon Wireless have strenghtened their lock on wireless broadband specrtum and plan to use the newly acquired 700 MHz for LTE based services.   As a result of acquisitions and 700 MHz auction wins, AT&T and Verizon Wireless now exceed the 95 MHz "Dobson Screen" in many markets.  So that FCC ruling has effectively been negated.  What will the FCC do now?
When a wireless carrier owns more than 95 MHz of spectrum in a given market, the FCC needs to state a reason to allow the amount over 95 MHz to be owned. So will they honor their own rule?  And what would be the reason to allow the carrier to own in excess of 95 MHz?  Note that Frontline Wireless (now out of business) filed numerous briefs at the FCC on this topic. 
From our esteemed anonymous source:   "Because outside the FCC safe harbor (spectrum in excess of 95 MHz) the FCC would need to waive its rules to grant these licenses…and what reason would they give?" 
The ball is now in the FCC’s court.  Will they take action or punt?
U.S. Cellular Spectrum Breakdown in U.S. following Post 700 MHz Auction: 
The following is from our esteemed anonymous source, who has analyzed the licensed spectrum in the U.S. post the recently completed FCC 700 MHz auction:
Here is the breakdown of US cellular spectrum AFTER the 700 MHz auction:
AT&T or Verizon Wireless exceeds the 95 MHz Dobson threshold in 8 of the top 10 US markets, 17 of the top 25 markets, and 38 of the top 100 markets.

Each of those wireless companies separately exceeds the threshold in 5 of the top 10 markets, 10 of the top 25 markets, and in one out of five of the top 100 markets.


  • New York, NY (VZ: 119 MHz)
  • Chicago, IL (VZ: 101 MHz)
  • Philadelphia, PA (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • Boston-Lowell-Brockton-Lawrence-Haverhill, MA-NH (AT&T: 99 MHz, VZ: 97 MHz)
  • San Francisco-Oakland, CA (AT&T: 97 MHz)
  • Washington, DC-MD-VA (AT&T: 99 MHz, VZ: 109 MHz)
  • Dallas-Forth Worth, TX (AT&T: 124 MHz)
  • Houston, TX (AT&T: 99 MHz)
  • Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood, FL (VZ: 96 MHz)
  • Baltimore, MD (AT&T: 99 MHz, VZ: 109 MHz)
  • Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • Atlanta, GA (AT&T: 99 MHz)
  • Denver-Boulder, CO (AT&T: 99 MHz)
  • Tampa-St. Petersburg, FL (AT&T: 99 MHz)
  • Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN (VZ: 111 MHz)
  • Kansas City, MO-KS (VZ: 114 MHz)
  • Buffalo, NY (AT&T: 119 MHz)
  • San Jose, CA (AT&T: 97 MHz)
  • Hartford-New Britain-Bristol, CT (AT&T: 109 MHz)
  • Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk-Danbury, CT (VZ: 119 MHz)
  • Toledo, OH-MI (VZ: 104 MHz)
  • New Haven-West Haven-Waterbury-Meriden, CT (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • Syracuse, NY (AT&T: 101 MHz)
  • Gary-Hammond-East Chicago, IN (AT&T: 99 MHz)
  • Northeast Pennsylvania, PA (VZ: 104 MHz)
  • Tulsa, OK (AT&T: 99 MHz)
  • Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • New Brunswick-Perth Amboy-Sayreville, NJ (VZ: 119 MHz)
  • Springfield-Chicopee-Holyoke, MA (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • Youngstown-Warren, OH (AT&T: 117 MHz)
  • Wilmington, DE-NJ-MD (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • Long Branch-Asbury Park, NJ (VZ: 119 MHz)
  • Raleigh-Durham, NC (VZ: 99 MHz)
  • West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL (VZ: 96 MHz)
  • Fresno, CA (AT&T: 115 MHz)
  • Austin, TX (AT&T: 104 MHz)
  • Wichita, KS (AT&T: 97 MHz)
  • Las Vegas, NV (AT&T: 99 MHz)

Questions to Ponder in light of AT&T and VZ Wireless Spectrum Grab

With the two giant wireless companies opting for LTE as a 4G technology, where does that leave Mobile WiMAX (Sprint, Clearwire), which will not have roaming or interoperability with the 2 U.S. carriers which have the most spectrum ? 

Where are the new carriers that were supposed to emerge, e.g. Frontline Wireless? 

Will there be any competition left for rural markets, which are currently underserved?

Will one or more companies build a heterogeneous network  for public safety (aftter the D Block auction failure)?


 Addendum:  Subsequently published articles on this topic:

1.   How much spectrum do AT&T and Verizon have?


"According to analysis from Alan Weissberger with DCT Advisors, AT&T or Verizon exceeds the 95 megahertz threshold in eight of the top 10 U.S. markets, 17 of the top 25 markets and 38 of the top 100 markets. See his chart of these markets here. In the Dallas-Fort Worth market, for instance, AT&T now holds 124 megahertz of spectrum."


Carriers’ binge on spectrum assets bring competitive concerns

The author interviewed me but was skeptical about the spectrum exceeding the 95MHz Dobson screen, which does not count AWS spectrum.  It is not known whether the numbers in my table include or exclude AWS.


0 thoughts on “FCC 700 MHz Auction Postscript: Big loss for US Wireless Network Competition

  1. This is huge, especially in an election year with $20 Billion at stake.

    In the Dobson Order, FCC Commissioners’ Copp, Adelstein and McDowell were concerned about increasing the spectrum to 95 MHz based on a 700 MHz spectrum auction that had yet to occur. From Commission McDowell:

    “While it is certainly important that we update our analytical tools from time to time, this action is decidedly premature and introduces an unnecessary level of complexity into the Commission’s market analyses. I also wonder how the new framework will affect participation in the forthcoming auction of 700 MHz spectrum.”

    The full order can be found at:


    Other documentation on the AT&T/Dobson, FCC WT Docket No. 07-153 can be found at:


  2. It’s amazing that no one has picked up on this before! The FCC should be on the hot seat for not taking any actions to enforce the 95 MHz screen, which has been violated by ATT and VZW in many US cellular markets. Where is the public outcry? Will this lead to the same kind of monopoly (in cellular services) that cable providers (MSOs) now have over cable TV prices?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept that my given data and my IP address is sent to a server in the USA only for the purpose of spam prevention through the Akismet program.More information on Akismet and GDPR.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.